Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Phoenix Weir vs Anton Matusevich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Weir vs Matusevich analysis and find out who is favored!
Phoenix Weir vs Anton Matusevich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Weir 1 - 0 Matusevich
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Weir has won 52.8% of points on their second serve, while Matusevich has won 49.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Weir, in recent form, has won 52.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matusevich has won 47.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.75% and 31.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Weir has saved 62.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matusevich has saved 62.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Weir has won 52.5% of matches played (W/L 21/ 19), with Matusevich winning 60.34% (W/L 35/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Weir has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Matusevich has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 42/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Weir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Matusevich has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Weir winning 1 times and Matusevich being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Weir winning 2 and Matusevich winning 0. The last match between Weir and Matusevich was at the M25 Bath, 12-01-2022, First, I.hard with Phoenix Weir getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Weir and Matusevich have played a deciding set 0 times, with Weir winning 0 times and Matusevich 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Weir winning 0, and Matusevich 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Weir has played against opponents with an average rank of 56.85 while Matusevich has played against players with an average rank of 248.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Weir has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matusevich has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Weir has converted 42.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matusevich has converted 35.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
434
Rank
388
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
49% (26-27)
Career Total W/L
61% (140-89)
50% (8-8)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Weir VS Matusevich H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Phoenix Weir | Anton Matusevich |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (39/55) | 44% (21/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (31/39) | 71% (15/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 63% (17/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (16/48) | 24% (13/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Weir VS Matusevich H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Phoenix Weir
Player
Anton Matusevich
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Phoenix Weir | Anton Matusevich |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (20/19) | 54% (27/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (222/202) | 51% (255/242) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 44% (4/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 135 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:18 | 1:47:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 44.56 | 306.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (639/1067) | 58% (900/1556) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (449/639) | 74% (665/900) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (226/428) | 50% (326/656) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (43/101) | 35% (54/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (408/1037) | 37% (611/1635) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (8/8) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 27% (11/3) |
Phoenix Weir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Phoenix Weir
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Delicata
Player
Phoenix Weir
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stijn Pel
Player
Phoenix Weir
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Nicolas Colne
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(6) 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Cezar Mihai Lupean
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Ryan James Storrie
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Fabien Salle
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-0 6-7(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Anton Matusevich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Anton Matusevich
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Anton Matusevich
48%
(
51 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
61 of
116)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
48 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
111
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Anton Matusevich
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Neil Oberleitner
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Daniele Minighini
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Anton Matusevich
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
78%
(
25 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Julio Cesar Porras
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Noah Lopez
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Weir Vs Matusevich Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Weir are available here and Matusevich photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
